Every year, some skeptics claim that December 25 as Jesus’ birth date is arbitrary or borrowed from pagan festivals. But the historical evidence tells a different story. Early Christians cared deeply about Jesus’ life, from His humble birth in Bethlehem to the angels, shepherds, and magi, and it is reasonable to think they would mark the anniversary of such a pivotal event.
Early Christian Interest in the Nativity
From the earliest centuries, Christians showed a clear concern for chronology, symbolism, and theological meaning. While Scripture does not command the celebration of Jesus’ birth, it devotes significant attention to the details surrounding it. This concern carried forward into early Christian reflection, where believers sought to understand not only what happened, but when.
Clement of Alexandria and Competing Dates
In his work Stromata (c. AD 194), Clement of Alexandria provides a snapshot of the various dates proposed for Jesus’ birth among different early Christian groups, demonstrating a lack of consensus at the close of the second century. He records that certain Egyptian theologians calculated the date as the 25th of Pachon (May 20 in the Julian calendar). Others suggested the 24th or 25th of Pharmuthi (April 19 or 20). Additionally, he mentions that the Basilidian Gnostics observed Jesus’ baptism, which some associated with His entry into the world, on the 15th or 11th of Tybi (January 6 or 10).
This reference to January 6 is historically significant, as early Eastern Christians observed this date as the Feast of the Theophany, commemorating Christ’s manifestation to the world, including His birth and baptism. While most Eastern churches later separated these celebrations, the Armenian Apostolic Church continues to observe both the Nativity and Baptism of Christ on January 6.
Clement himself, through complex chronological calculations, proposed his own date of the 25th of Hatar (November 18 in the Julian calendar) in the 28th year of the reign of Emperor Augustus. This shows that early Christians were actively debating and calculating dates rather than inheriting one uncritically from pagan culture.
ATTENTION! I want to alert you to my Free booklet of 15+ Christmas myths! Check it out and tell me what you think. Grab yours by clicking the below link and I’ll also send you the latest iApologia updates!
15+ Myths of Christmas the Bible Doesn’t Teach
Conception, Chronology, and Theological Reasoning
In Stromata, Clement of Alexandria also notes calculations related to the conception of Jesus. Early Christians often reasoned backward from key theological dates rather than forward from uncertain historical records. By identifying a conception date and counting nine months forward, Christians could arrive at a proposed birth date.
This approach shows that early Christians were thinking seriously about the timing of the Incarnation, not leaving it to chance or cultural convenience.
Hippolytus of Rome and December 25
Around AD 202, Hippolytus of Rome wrote in his Commentary on Daniel:
“For the first advent of our Lord in the flesh, when he was born in Bethlehem, eight days before the Kalends of January…”
In Roman dating, eight days before the Kalends of January corresponds to December 25. This is one of the earliest explicit references identifying December 25 as the date of Christ’s birth.
Hippolytus also connects Jesus’ suffering to March 25, revealing an early symbolic framework that linked conception, crucifixion, and birth within a coherent theological timeline.
The Integral Age Hypothesis
Early Christians often used what scholars call the integral age hypothesis, the idea that a prophet’s life began and ended on the same calendar day. By this reasoning, if Jesus was conceived on March 25, His birth would naturally fall nine months later, on December 25.
Sextus Julius Africanus, writing in the early third century, also records March 25 as the date of Christ’s conception. This confirms that the framework used by Hippolytus was not isolated but part of a broader early Christian tradition.
Church Fathers and Liturgical Continuity
Later sources confirm that December 25 was widely recognized in the early Church. John Chrysostom (c. AD 347–407) refers to the celebration as familiar and long-standing, not a recent innovation or a borrowed pagan custom.
The Apostolic Constitutions, a fourth-century collection of early liturgical instructions, lists December 25 as the proper day to commemorate Christ’s birth. These sources show that the date was already well established long before medieval Europe formalized Christmas customs.
Why March 25 Matters
March 25 held deep significance in early Christian thought. Some traditions linked it to the Annunciation, the day Mary conceived Jesus. Others associated it with the date of Creation or even the Passion.
This alignment demonstrates that early Christians were driven by symbolic and theological reasoning. The choice of December 25 emerges from this internal logic rather than from an attempt to mimic or replace pagan festivals.
The Takeaway for Today
Understanding this history allows Christians to celebrate Christmas with confidence. The date is not arbitrary, and the tradition is rooted in careful theological reflection and early Christian testimony. Celebrating on December 25 connects believers with centuries of Christians who valued both the birth of Christ and the mystery of the Incarnation.
Christmas stands as a reminder that faith, symbolism, and devotion, not cultural overlap, shape the traditions Christians honor.
I would love for you to come along with me and not miss a post! In the future, I plan on giving more resources and answers. Plus, I want to send you a Free Quick Guide why I think science points to God. I would love for you to have this Free Quick Guide and the latest posts straight to your inbox. Please grab your Free Quick Guide why I think science points to God here.
So, what did you think? Feel free to share your thoughts below!
“Sextus Julius Africanus, writing in the early third century, also records March 25 as the date of Christ’s conception.”
Please, help me. Where does this claim come from? I’ve read everything Africanus I can find and I can’t find the support for this claim.
This is what I found:
According to Alden A. Mosshammer, Julius Africanus wrote the Chronographiai, a history of the world in five volumes, which covered the period from Creation to 221 AD. Africanus calculated the period between Creation and Jesus as 5,500 years and placed the divine Incarnation on the spring equinox, 25 March, in AM 5501, equivalent to 1 BC. By a nine-month gestation, this implies the traditional December 25 date for the Nativity. The original work of Africanus is lost, so there is no surviving direct quote in which he explicitly says that Jesus was conceived on March 25. Scholars reconstruct this chronology from later sources such as George Syncellus. This method of reckoning influenced several Greek Eastern Mediterranean Creation eras, all placing Creation around 5500 BC. The best scholarly reference for this information is Alden A. Mosshammer, The Easter Computus and the Origins of the Christian Era, Oxford University Press, 2008, which explains Africanus’ chronological system and its implications for the dating of the Incarnation and the Nativity.